The Bukharin alternative was quite realistic, but the trouble of N. I. Bukharin was that he could not consistently uphold it to the end. He did not respond properly to criticism of the theory of equilibrium by Stalin, although he has been developing this theory all his life. N. I. Bukharin did not speak out against Stalin's criticism of the so-called “theory of gravity” in economic construction, although he advocated the objectivity of economic laws. He did not give a proper rebuff to the "extraordinary", raised by Stalin to the norm of socialist construction. Although N. I. Bukharin addressed in 1929 with a letter criticizing the “military feudal” methods of planting collective farms, the deliberate “planting of bureaucracy” and the actual defeat of the Comintern, he could not defend his position to the end. Therefore, the Bukharin alternative was defeated, despite the fact that it could become a turning point in the history of our country, and the whole world.
It is difficult to judge the integrity of the Bukharin alternative, but there is no doubt that it correctly emphasized the strengthening of the workers and peasants bloc on the basis of “exchange processes” between the city and the village. His provisions on the need to maintain equivalence between the latter, on the redistribution of resources by peaceful economic means, relied much more on Leninism than the miserable Stalinist attempts to justify violence against the peasantry by referring to Leninist criticism of the theory of "sustainability" of the peasant economy under conditions of rapid industrial progress. I.V. Stalin replaced the Leninist attitude, because V.I. Lenin was talking about the instability of peasant small farms under capitalism: the presence of socialized industry fully allowed an alternative to free and non-capitalist development or, as N. I. Bukharin noted, "peaceful growth »All the elements of peasant farming in the mainstream of socialist cooperation.
The theory of “sustainability” of labor peasant farming was most deeply substantiated by theorist and practitioner of peasant farming A. V. Chayanov. Even before October, he showed the advantages of family labor cooperation over the Leviathans of capitalist agriculture - it could become a form of combining individual farms with the advantages of cooperation. It is no accident that A. V. Chayanov put forward the slogan of "self-collectivization", providing for the possibility of preserving the independence of peasant households with elements of a socialist social economy. He was not a supporter of "giant" farms in which some modern economists see the basis of their socialist development, and all his life he defended the advantages of "family" cooperation in combination with cooperatives, which grew extremely rapidly in the 20s. Young girls (18+) want to do Wirth in online erotic chat! Come and enjoy chatting with beautiful young girls! Our girls love porn chat, they are incredibly artistic and capable of endless transformation. They can be both modest, and live sex chat cams
girls and naked women, Nude students are waiting for you in a real women's video chat, where you can chat on a webcam online! Girl cums from Masturbation for the first time, sex chat for free Online.